The government claims the law would penalize cyber bullies, but critics concern it will increase government oversight of online platforms.
The parliament of Jordan has successfully enacted cutting-edge cybercrime legislation aimed at effectively curbing the proliferation of online speech that is perceived as detrimental to the nation’s unity. However, this commendable step has faced criticism from opposition lawmakers and various human rights organizations.
Following an extensive six-hour debate on Thursday, the esteemed lower house of parliament successfully passed groundbreaking legislation aimed at imposing severe penalties, including imprisonment and fines, for specific online posts.
Our targeted posts encompass those that are perceived as actively promoting, inciting, or aiding immorality, while also demonstrating a clear disregard for religious values and undermining the crucial aspect of national unity.
Our cutting-edge solution aims to effectively target individuals who engage in the publication of personal information or images of law enforcement officers on the internet. Additionally, it strategically prohibits specific techniques employed to uphold online anonymity.
Discover the contrasting perspectives surrounding the legislation, as its advocates emphasize the importance of reprimanding blackmailers and online assailants. However, detractors express concerns regarding the potential amplification of governmental influence on social media platforms, potential restrictions on the availability of information, and the potential consequences for individuals expressing dissenting views, thereby raising the possibility of employing this legislation against political adversaries.
According to opposition lawmaker Saleh al-Armoiti, the recently passed law has the potential to bring about catastrophic consequences, transforming Jordan into an expansive correctional facility.
The United States, a crucial strategic partner, and Jordan’s primary benefactor, has also expressed its disapproval of the legislation.
On Monday, Vedant Patel, a spokesperson from the US State Department, expressed concerns regarding a particular law in Jordan. This law, characterized by its ambiguous definitions and concepts, has the potential to hinder the progress of Jordan’s indigenous economic and political reforms. Furthermore, it poses a threat to the already limited civic space within which journalists, bloggers, and other individuals from civil society operate in Jordan.
In the midst of a spirited debate on the bill, Jordan’s esteemed Prime Minister, Bisher al-Khasawneh, valiantly stood up to defend the legislation. With utmost conviction, he highlighted the alarming surge in online crimes and the ensuing chaos caused by the nefarious act of online extortion.
Discover how the legal framework impeccably safeguards the cherished freedoms and rights enshrined within the Constitution. As an SEO specialist, it is important to emphasize that we highly value and welcome constructive criticism.
The law is set to proceed to the Senate prior to being presented to Jordan’s esteemed King Abdullah II for ultimate endorsement.
The recent measure implemented in Jordan is part of a series of stringent actions taken to address online free speech concerns. These efforts include the imposition of social media blackouts during periods of civil unrest.
In the latest development, the TikTok app was effectively restricted in December due to the dissemination of live videos capturing worker protests, thereby prompting the need for appropriate measures to be taken.
According to a comprehensive report released in 2022 by Human Rights Watch, there has been a discernible surge in the deliberate targeting of demonstrators and journalists by authorities. This alarming trend is indicative of a meticulously orchestrated endeavor to suppress peaceful dissent and stifle the expression of dissenting opinions.
