By Zabih Ullah Khattak (Pakistan)

Donald Trump and kamala Harris stand on the opposing sides of the key issues, from national security to economic policies. Let’s explore the reasons why Trump’s policies set him apart as a stronger leader for the United States. Firstly, Kamala Harris’s stance on abortion centers around supporting women’s rights, which many see as critical to personal freedom. However, she neglects the rights of unborn children. Trump has consistently voiced pro-life opinions, aligning with those who feel that protecting potential lives is essential for society. Secondly, Trump emphasizes that America’s borders should remain secure, welcoming immigrants who go through legal channels. His border policy aims to protect US land and ensure security.

Thirdly, Trump has pledged to address the drug crisis with military support, stiff penalties for assaults, and record funding for law enforcement. In his approach, Trump aims to strengthen the police force, reduce crime, and create safer communities. Supporters view this as an action-driven strategy to address the escalating drug crisis, which they argue is more effective than the policies favored by Harris and her allies.

Fourthly, Trump’s economic promises include lower taxes, bigger paychecks, and more jobs for Americans. During his administration, the US saw its lowest unemployment rate in 50 years. His tax reforms and economic strategies focused on boosting American workers and businesses, offering a stark contrast to Democratic policies that, in the view of some, place too much strain on the face of average workers.

Fifthly, Trump has asserted he could resolve the Russian-Ukraine conflict in a single day, citing his belief in diplomacy. He emphasizes non-interventionist policies and advocates for the withdrawal of US troops from overseas, as seen with the Afghanistan withdrawal, an initiative he set into motion through the Doha Accord. This non-intervention approach has earned him the support of those who favor a stronger focus on American issues.

Sixthly, Trump has criticized NATO, challenging its effectiveness and urging the alliance to operate with measurable results rather than relying on American funds without significant returns. This view aligns with his commitment to holding international organizations accountable, a stance that contrasts with Harris’s more traditional support to multilateral organizations.

Seventhly, on one critique, Trump has been silent on condemning actions by the Israeli government against Palestine, leaving supporters looking for stronger statements on this issue. While some Democrats, including Harris, occasionally voice concerns over Israeli policies, many argue that this is superficial and driven by voter expectations rather than a commitment to justice. Neither party has taken steps to reduce US aid to Israel significantly, a point that continues to stir debate among American voters, especially in the Muslim community.

In conclusion one can say that Trump is comparatively doing far better than Kamala Harris. His policies from immigration to poverty seem better than Kamala Harris and one can also argue that Kamala Harris remained as vice president of the USA but could not bring any substantial changes which tend to say a progressive approach. One must worthy of noting is the intensity of the article, because this is a comparative analysis and the writer does not and could not believe that Trump has every kind of qualities which are preliminary for a good leader, but here the American landscape, Trump is far better than his counterpart the Democratic Nominee Kamala Harris.